Carbon Border Adjustment at the Definitive Stage: Exposure Channels, Domestic Carbon Pricing and Green Finance Architecture in Azerbaijan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1956/jge.v22i3.986Keywords:
carbon border adjustment mechanism, carbon pricing, carbon leakage, green finance, AzerbaijanAbstract
The European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) entered its definitive phase on 1 January 2026, converting an instrument of climate policy into an operative condition of market access. This paper examines what that transition means for a small, hydrocarbon-dependent open economy that is simultaneously attempting to diversify its industrial exports and to position itself as a supplier of renewable electricity to the European market. Using documentary analysis of the CBAM legal framework together with scenario-based sensitivity estimates, the study maps Azerbaijan’s exposure across four transmission channels: products already within scope (aluminium, iron and steel, fertilisers), electricity exports planned through the Black Sea submarine interconnector, transit and supply-chain effects associated with the Trans-Caspian corridor, and the prospective downstream extension of the mechanism from 2028. Three findings emerge. First, the financial burden of 2026 is negligible because only 2.5 per cent of embedded emissions attract a certificate obligation in the first year; the binding constraint is instead the absence of verified installation-level emissions data, which triggers conservative country-specific default values carrying a mark-up that rises from 10 per cent in 2026 to 30 per cent in 2028. Second, because a documented domestic carbon price is deductible from the CBAM liability, the policy question is not whether the carbon cost is paid but to whose budget it accrues; the paper shows, however, that this rent-capture logic only becomes fiscally advantageous once the phase-in factor is high, and quantifies the threshold. Third, drawing on recent panel evidence, the paper argues that the binding constraint on green investment in Azerbaijan is the architecture of green finance rather than the volume of fiscal expenditure. An eight-point policy framework and a sequencing timetable are proposed.
References
[1] Abdulhasanova, R., Ahmadova, S., Mahmudov, J., Alasgarova, F., and Akhmedova, A., 2026, “Does Government Environmental Spending Crowd in Green Investment? The Role of Carbon Pricing and the Limits of Fiscal Policy Alone,” Economies, 14(8), 315.
[2] Abdulhasanova, R., 2025, “Bridging the Finance Gap: Mobilizing Capital for Azerbaijan’s Green Economy Transition,” Scientific Work, 19(6), pp. 29–33.
[3] Aliyev, S., Hasanov, R. I., Aghayeva, K., Gasimov, J. Y., and Ahmadova, S. E., 2024, “The Relationship Between Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Insights from Iceland and Azerbaijan,” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(5), pp. 229–235.
[4] Abdulhasanova, R., Ahmadova, S., and Alasgarova, F., 2026, “Integrating Decarbonization Strategies and Closed-Loop Supply Chain Design for Sustainable Logistics: An Integrative Systematic Review and Six-Pillar Analytical Framework,” Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, 11(1), pp. 97–117.
[5] Ahmadova, S. E., Abdulhasanova, R., Abdulhasanov, T., Nuriyeva, N., and Mohsumova, V., 2026, “The Role of Investment Priorities in Ensuring Ecological Sustainability in Azerbaijan’s Economy,” Scientific Work, 20(3), pp. 149–158.
[6] Abdulhasanova, R., Ahmadova, S., Hasanova, Z., and Turabova, Z., 2026, “Customs Efficiency and Logistics Performance in Azerbaijan: Implications for International Trade Development,” International Indexing, 3(2), pp. 5–13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Global Economy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.