Generations Differ on Work Attitude and Work Engagement in Indian Organizations

Authors

  • Rajmani Pandey Swami Rama Himalayan University (SRHU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1956/jge.v22i2.849

Keywords:

generational cohorts, work engagement, work attitude, Baby Boomers, Millennials, Vigour, Dedication, Absorption, Job Satisfaction, Turnover Intention, India

Abstract

India’s corporate sector now hosts four concurrent generational cohorts—Baby Boomers (1946–1965), Generation X (1966–1979), Generation Y / Millennials (1980–1994), and Generation Z (post-1995)—each shaped by distinct socio-economic conditions. This study examines how these cohorts differ on Work Attitude (Job Satisfaction, Organisational Commitment, Job Involvement, and Turnover Intentions) and Work Engagement (Vigour, Dedication, and Absorption). Drawing on primary data from 755 Indian corporate employees, analysed through Chi-square tests, one-way ANOVA with post-hoc comparisons, exploratory factor analysis, and structural equation modelling (SEM), the study finds statistically significant generational differences on all seven sub-dimensions. Baby Boomers score highest on Vigour, Dedication, and Absorption; Generation Z scores lowest on Dedication and Absorption; Generation Y exhibits the lowest Vigour. Baby Boomers and Generation X demonstrate stronger organisational commitment and lower turnover intentions than younger cohorts. Factor analysis reveals three latent Work Attitude constructs (Job Satisfaction, Turnover Intention, Perks-Incentives) and SEM confirms that leadership attributes, mediated by Work Attitude, significantly predict Work Engagement. The paper closes with generation-sensitive HR and leadership recommendations.

References

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18.

Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice (13th ed.). Kogan Page.

Bejtkovský, J. (2016). The employees of baby boomers generation, generation X, generation Y and generation Z in selected Czech corporations as conceivers of development and competitiveness in their corporation. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(4), 105–123.

Bersin, J. (2013). The myth of the millennial: What managers need to know. Deloitte Insights.

Burns, J. M. (1987). Leadership. Harper & Row.

Daboval, J. (1998). A comparison between baby boomer and generation X employees’ bases and foci of commitment. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 54–70.

Dwyer, R. J. (2009). Preparing for the future: Understanding the four generations in today’s workforce. On the Horizon, 17(2), 176–185.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279.

Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102–117). Psychology Press.

Howell, J. P., & Costley, D. L. (2001). Understanding behaviors for effective leadership. Prentice Hall.

Kapoor, C., & Solomon, N. (2011). Understanding and managing generational differences in the workplace. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 3(4), 308–318.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2007). The leadership challenge (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Lodahl, T. M., & Kejnar, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1), 24–33.

Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In K. Mannheim (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276–322). Routledge.

Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247.

Northouse, P. G. (2015). Leadership: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Sage.

Revutska, O., & Maršíková, K. (2021). Agile approach in human resource management: Focus on generation Y. E&M Economics and Management, 24(1), 101–117.

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.

Shanker, M., & Sayeed, O. B. (2012). Role of transformational leaders as change agents: Leveraging effects on organisational climate. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 470–484.

Sprinkle, T., & Urick, M. (2018). Three generational issues in organizational learning: Knowledge management, perspectives on training, and the transition from late boomers to millennials. The Learning Organization, 25(2), 102–112.

Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. William Morrow.

Twenge, J. M. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 201–210.

Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142.

Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.

Downloads

Published

04.06.2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“Generations Differ on Work Attitude and Work Engagement in Indian Organizations” (2026) Journal of Global Economy, 22(2), pp. 98–108. doi:10.1956/jge.v22i2.849.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 271

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.